Dr Jörg Kreienbrock

IAS Fellow at St Mary’s College, Durham University (October – December 2017)

Jörg Kreienbrock is an Associate Professor in the Department of German and Critical Thought and the Program in Comparative Literary Studies at Northwestern University. He received his PhD. in 2005 from the Department of German at New York University with a dissertation thesis examining representations of the small and minute in the prose works of Robert Walser. From 2005 to 2006 he held a position as Visiting Assistant Professor of German Studies at Emory University. He spent the 2015/16 academic year as an Alexander von Humboldt fellow in the Department of Media Studies at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

His research and teaching interests include German literature from the 18th to the 21st century with an emphasis on literary theory, contemporary literature, the history of science, and popular culture. Dr Kreienbrock is the author of Kleiner. Feiner. Leichter: Nuancierungen zum Werk Robert Walsers (Berlin, Zurich: Diaphanes 2010); Malicious Objects, Anger Management, and the Question of Modern Literature (New York: Fordham University Press 2012); and as co-editor of Die Amerikanischen Götter: Transatlantische Prozesse in der Deutschsprachigen Popkultur seit 1945 (Berlin: de Gruyter 2015).

While in Durham, Dr Kreienbrock aims to analyze the various fields of knowledge (Gestalt psychology, theoretical biology, linguistic structuralism, ethnography) that Ernst Cassirer summarizes under the notion of a new holistic organicism. These disciplines are representative of a particular type of German proto-structuralism, which developed under the concepts of Gestalt, Form, and Wholeness during the first half of the 20th century. According to these theories, elements within a structure, objects in the world, or parts of a whole are all conceptualized as emplacements within a field, which does not serve as a neutral background but instead generates these phenomena, giving shape and meaning in the act of producing space and creating a world. In this sense, they all resemble de Saussure’s structural notion of language, which, according to Katherine Hayles, must be understood “as an integrated nondivisible whole, that is to say, as a unified field composed of parts but not reducible to the sum of its parts.”